Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Mulholland Drive analysis - part 19: The meaning of the color pink

CATEGORY: MOVIES **Contains spoilers**




























Various shades of pink are used in the movie, to indicate Diane's various 'personas'. Top left: Betty, wearing a dark pinkish sweater, represents Diane's 'aspiring actress' persona. Top right: The sign for the Pink's eatery that the prostitute, hit man, and pimp are shown exiting, indicates the presence of Diane's call-girl persona. Above left: The waitress in Winkie's, who is wearing a very light pink shirt, represents Diane's 'ordinary-job-persona', or perhaps we could call it her 'call-girl-on-the-mend' persona. (Recall that we said earlier that Diane had worked at Winkie's at some point.) Above right: Lorraine, with pink paint stains on her dress, represents Diane's 'revenge-persona' - that part of Diane that wanted to get revenge on Adam. As stated earlier in the analysis, the dead and decomposing body that Betty and Rita, and later the cowboy, see has hair that matches Lorraine's hair instead of Betty's or Diane's. However, Rita is extremely horrified upon seeing the body, because, as Diane's subconscious, she senses that the body in some way represents the death of Diane herself.

















Above left: All three women in the first group auditioning for The Sylvia North Story , are each wearing at least one article of pink clothing.
Above right: The second person to audition, the Camilla Rhodes 'double', is wearing pink clothing and has blond hair. Taken together with the women at left and with the pink symbolism as described earlier above, this represents Diane's dream-wish that she was effectively the only one auditioning for the role. However, as discussed earlier in the analysis, the fact that the blond woman is named Camilla Rhodes is the indication that the real Camilla did go on to audition for, and get, the role, after she escaped from the hit man whom Diane hired.



   

Disclaimers
1) In certain instances I have determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source
material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society. These statements should not be taken as expressing my own personal opinions.

2) I am not now, nor have I ever been, associated in any manner personal or professional with any of the studios, creators, authors, publishers, directors, actors, musicians, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the media productions or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog.

Copyright Statement
All original material on this blog © 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 blog author

All borrowed images on cananalyze.blogpsot.com are readily available in various places on the Internet and believed to be in public domain. Images posted are believed to be posted within my rights according to the U.S. Copyright Fair Use Act (Title 17, U.S. Code).

Marcus Aurelius's Meditations - from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released
under CC-BY-SA.
Saint Augustine's Confessions, City of God, and On the Trinity - all from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under CC-BY-SA.
Saint Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica and Saint Anselm's Monologion from the Logos Virtual Library, compiled and edited by Darren L. Slider; believed to be in public domain
Emanuel Swedenborg's works from The Internet Sacred Text Archive (except where otherwise noted); believed to be in public domain

If you believe that any material on this blog violates your copyright claim, please notify the blog author via email at thenewdavid@yahoo.com, and a prompt effort will be made to remedy the situation, including removal of the infringing material if necessary.