Friday, May 13, 2011

Lecter series - unified analysis - part 1: Lecter's magic touch

CATEGORY: MOVIES; WARNING: THIS ANALYSIS CONTAINS SPOILERS!!

Welcome to the unified analysis of the first three Hannibal Lecter movies: Manhunter, The Silence of the Lambs, and Hannibal. Buttons at the bottom of each post enable navigation through the parts of the analysis. You may want to view the table of contents. This unified analysis is not a compilation or summary of the individual analyses of the three movies just mentioned; rather, it is an extension of those analyses. Regarding the appearance of possible anti-Semitism on this blog, please see the 'Disclaimers' section near the bottom of this page.

We begin by observing that in two of the three movies analyzed in this unified analysis, The Silence of the Lambs and Hannibal, Hannibal Lecter represents, among other entities (including a personification of Satan), the evil elite hermaphroditic Jews who, along with other evil parties (e.g., certain high-ranking Freemasons and Mormons), desire to establish a modern-day 'New Jerusalem' (i.e., a utopia) in southern Indiana. However, in Manhunter, the character's surname is spelled 'Lecktor', and this spelling change indicates that Hannibal does not represent Jews, or any subset thereof, in Manhunter. There will be more on the details of the name change itself later.








From The Silence of the Lambs: Using his right hand, Lecter touches Starling's hand through the cell bars in Memphis. Not long after this, Starling has her revelation about Jame Gumb assembling his 'suit' of skin from various pieces of his women victims' skins.








From Hannibal: Lecter uses his right hand to touch Starling's hair, as he passes her on the carousel in Union Station. The purpose of this 'magic touch' is to help protect Starling when she later encounters Mason Verger and his goons at Verger's boar pen.



   





Disclaimers
1) In certain instances it has been determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society in their productions. These statements should be taken as expressing the opinions of no one other than the creators.

2) This blog is not associated with any of the studios, creators, authors, publishers, directors, actors, musicians, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the media productions or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced herein.

3) In keeping with the policies of the filmmakers, authors, studios, writers, publishers, and musicians, that have created the productions (and their source materials) that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog, any similarity of the characters in these films or source materials to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All images on this blog are used solely for non-commercial purposes of analysis, review, and critique.

All Wikipedia content on this blog, and any edits made to it, are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Marcus Aurelius's Meditations - from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Augustine's Confessions and City of God from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica from the 'Logos Virtual Library' website (except where otherwise noted), compiled and edited by Darren L. Slider; believed to be in public domain.