Friday, November 13, 2009

Manhunter analysis - part 42: Francis comes to despise Reba

CATEGORY: MOVIES

It is not difficult to see how Reba is portrayed as both a virgin and a 'whore' in the movie. When Dollarhyde offers to give her a ride home from work, with a "surprise" on the way (this turns out to be the tiger visit), she refuses several times, then relents. This can be interpreted as a promiscuous woman 'playing hard to get', but not being afraid to ride with a strange man, as if she has done so before (i.e., with other men besides Dollarhyde); or, it can be interpreted as the 'innocence' of a virgin, of someone not experienced in dating - she naively fails to consider that riding with a stranger could be dangerous.




Above left and right: Once Reba has been in Dollarhyde's house for a while, the 'whore' within her may seem to take over, but even her initiation of the sexual interaction between them could be seen as part of the first love-making experience of an innocent woman - she does not consider it improper to seduce him.


Dollarhyde later comes to see Reba as a whore, due to the fact that he misinterprets her interaction with another man (Ralph Mandy) as having sexual overtones, as shown in the below screencaps.





Top left: Francis, who has been waiting outside Reba's house without her knowing it, is initially excited upon seeing her arrive home. He begins to get out of his van to greet her, but then notices that she is with Ralph Mandy. Top right: Mandy removes a piece of something from Reba's cheek. Above left: This is how Francis interprets the interaction between Mandy and Reba. Above right: Francis's anguished reaction at what he thinks he has seen.

Dollarhyde's reaction to seeing Reba with Mandy, is to kidnap her and hold her in his house, where, as shown in the below screencap, he stands over her menacingly as if about to kill her.










Francis standing over Reba near the movie's ending.


      





Disclaimers
1) In certain instances it has been determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society in their productions. These statements should be taken as expressing the opinions of no one other than the creators.

2) This blog is not associated with any of the studios, creators, authors, publishers, directors, actors, musicians, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the media productions or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced herein.

3) In keeping with the policies of the filmmakers, authors, studios, writers, publishers, and musicians, that have created the productions (and their source materials) that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog, any similarity of the characters in these films or source materials to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All images on this blog are used solely for non-commercial purposes of analysis, review, and critique.

All Wikipedia content on this blog, and any edits made to it, are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Marcus Aurelius's Meditations - from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Augustine's Confessions and City of God from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica from the 'Logos Virtual Library' website (except where otherwise noted), compiled and edited by Darren L. Slider; believed to be in public domain.