Friday, November 25, 2011

Mulholland Drive analysis - part 18: Diane's animus: Adam and the Cowboy

CATEGORY: MOVIES














In Jungian psychology, the animus can be identified as the totality of the unconscious masculine psychological qualities that a female possesses. It is an archetype of the collective unconscious and not an aggregate of father, brothers, uncles, or teachers, though these aspects of the personal unconscious can influence for good or ill the person. Jung postulated that women have a host of animus images.[a]

Adam and the Cowboy taken together, comprise a kind of 'split animus' within Diane. Adam is the more 'intellectual' of the pair of men, and the fact that he wears black clothing throughout the movie symbolizes that Diane's intellect, has been 'cross-contaminated' with contents from her psychological shadow. In Jungian psychology, the shadow is an unconscious complex defined as the repressed, suppressed or disowned qualities of the conscious self.[b] Recall that in Diane's dream, Adam beat up the Castigliane brothers' limousine with a golf club; this indicates that Diane's shadow consists, in part, of an instinct tending toward violence. One reason we don't see Diane herself actually commit any violence during the movie, is because she represses or suppresses this instinct.

The Cowboy represents the more conventionally masculine of the two images of Diane's animus, and he also represents that part of Diane's animus that serves as mediator between her unconscious and conscious mind, and that can act a a guide. When the Cowboy speaks to Adam in Diane's dream, he is, in reality, speaking to Diane while she's in her dreaming state, and he is attempting to get Diane's intellect to listen to her unconscious.


a. Wikipedia, 'Anima and animus'. Web, n.d. URL = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anima_and_animus.
b. Wikipedia, 'Analytical psychology'. Web, n.d. URL = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytical_psychology.


   





Disclaimers
1) In certain instances it has been determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society in their productions. These statements should be taken as expressing the opinions of no one other than the creators.

2) This blog is not associated with any of the studios, creators, authors, publishers, directors, actors, musicians, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the media productions or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced herein.

3) In keeping with the policies of the filmmakers, authors, studios, writers, publishers, and musicians, that have created the productions (and their source materials) that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog, any similarity of the characters in these films or source materials to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All images on this blog are used solely for non-commercial purposes of analysis, review, and critique.

All Wikipedia content on this blog, and any edits made to it, are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Marcus Aurelius's Meditations - from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Augustine's Confessions and City of God from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica from the 'Logos Virtual Library' website (except where otherwise noted), compiled and edited by Darren L. Slider; believed to be in public domain.